Redefining Live Broadcast Cinematography
Live broadcast cinematography with ALEXA 35 Live cameras is the use of cinema-grade digital camera systems in multi-camera live events, combining large-sensor image quality with real-time control, monitoring, and transmission workflows traditionally associated with broadcast trucks and fiber infrastructures. For the Eurovision Song Contest 2026, ARRI supplied 24 ALEXA 35 Live cameras that covered every position from the first build days in Munich through to the grand final watched by roughly 180 million people. The goal was simple but ambitious: answer the question of what happens when live television starts to look like cinema. Long dominated by broadcast-specific cameras from established manufacturers, live TV had operated in a parallel universe to motion picture production. Eurovision’s organizers and ARRI set out to merge those worlds on one of the most demanding live stages in entertainment.

From Milled Metal to Multi-Camera Production Workflow
The ALEXA 35 Live cameras used for Eurovision began life in ARRI’s Munich headquarters as solid blocks of aluminum and titanium, milled and assembled around the same sensor architecture that defines many theatrical releases. In parallel, ARRI’s Vienna team built and tested LPS-1 Live Production System units, which turn the cinema camera into a fiber-based system compatible with familiar broadcast controls. This combination allowed the cameras to sit inside a multi-camera production workflow without breaking established practices for shaders and operators. Installed in NEP’s OB truck—originally built for Grass Valley systems—the ALEXA 35 Live cameras connected via Riedel MediorNet infrastructure alongside cable cams, cranes, and wireless rigs. Only a small interface adapter was needed to translate intercom and tally protocols; the rest was careful signal routing, tele-return paths, and monitoring layouts to keep 24 cinema cameras behaving like long-time broadcast workhorses.

Shading, Control, and the ‘Camera That Behaves Like Broadcast’
In high-stakes live broadcast, shading is where a camera system succeeds or fails. Inside the OB van, each shader was responsible for six to eight ALEXA 35 Live cameras, matching exposure, color, and contrast in what ARRI called coordinated chaos. NEP Engineer-in-Charge Erhard Thüringer described the shading experience as “completely identical to standard broadcast cameras,” a statement that mattered because his team was used to conventional systems. According to ARRI, eight CCUs were integrated into the NEP truck while maintaining the same comfort level for broadcast engineers. A LiveEdit rundown system tied the camera’s predefined looks into the wider gallery workflow, so directors and vision mixers could rely on consistent images as they cut between 24 live sources, plus additional specialty cameras, without changing the pace or discipline of traditional live television direction.

Why Cinema Camera Live Events Look Different On Screen
On-air, the leap from broadcast sensors to the ALEXA 35 Live Super 35 sensor was visible to viewers at home. The larger sensor delivered higher dynamic range, reducing clipped highlights from aggressive stage lighting and preserving detail in faces, costumes, and props. It also reduced moiré on bright LED walls, a persistent problem for smaller sensors. Skin tones remained natural as color and intensity of light shifted from act to act, while pyrotechnics and fire effects retained detail and believable color where traditional broadcast cameras often struggle. ORF’s creative team used these strengths to give the show a more cinematic depth and texture without losing the immediacy of live television. The result showed how cinema camera live events can preserve storytelling nuance on a fast-cutting, music-driven show that still runs on tight cues and unforgiving timings.
Redundancy, Troubleshooting, and the Future of Live Broadcast
Running 24 ALEXA 35 Live cameras on a complex set demanded synchronized workflows, redundancy plans, and rapid troubleshooting protocols. Fiber paths, CCUs, intercom, tally, and monitoring had to be checked continuously from the initial build through every rehearsal and live show. ARRI engineers, ORF crews, and NEP staff worked side by side in an evolving test bench: small issues in routing or control surfaced during rehearsals and were solved before they could affect the live broadcast. For ARRI, which has dominated cinema for more than a century, Eurovision became a proof-of-concept that cinema-grade sensors can integrate into standard live broadcast infrastructure. NEP’s Thüringer summed up the shift by saying that, given the choice, he would again pick the ARRI cameras—a hint that future large-scale live shows may increasingly combine cinematic image quality with the reliability expectations of broadcast engineering.

