Big Picture: Two Premium Foldable Phones, Very Different Bets
This foldable phone comparison looks at Apple’s rumored iPhone Ultra and Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide, focusing on design choices, performance, cameras, battery, and pricing so buyers can judge which premium foldable phone better matches their needs based on credible early leaks and established product strategies. Apple’s first foldable is shaping up as a wide, tablet‑like iPhone that opens like a book, while Samsung’s latest Galaxy Z Fold refines a proven design with a lighter body and upgraded internals. If you live inside Apple’s ecosystem and want a compact tablet experience, the iPhone Ultra is the exciting—but expensive—wild card. If you value reliability from a brand with several generations of foldables already on the market, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide is the safer, more predictable choice.
| Spec | iPhone Ultra (rumored) | Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide (rumored) |
|---|---|---|
| Inner display | Approx. 7.8-inch wide, book-style foldable | Approx. 7.6-inch foldable display |
| Cover display | Approx. 5.3-inch outer screen | Approx. 5.5-inch outer screen |
| Chipset | Apple A20 Pro, in-house C2 modem | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB |
| Rear cameras | Dual 48MP rear cameras | 50MP main + 50MP ultra-wide |
| Selfie cameras | Separate cover and inner selfie cameras (resolution not leaked) | Dual 10MP selfie cameras |
| Battery | Not yet disclosed; efficiency expected from tight hardware–software integration | Approx. 4,800mAh with Super Fast Charging 2.0 support |
| Price expectation | Well over USD 2,000 (approx. RM9,200), leaks suggest around USD 2,500 (approx. RM11,500) | Not yet leaked; expected to target the premium foldable phones segment |
Design and Displays: Tablet-Like iPhone vs Refined Fold
On design, the iPhone Ultra and Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide are going after different kinds of foldable users. Leaks point to Apple using a wider book-style layout that opens into an experience “roughly the same size as the iPad mini,” with a 7.8-inch inner panel and 5.3-inch cover display. That wide canvas should favor streaming, gaming, and iPad‑style multitasking, and Apple is reportedly pushing iOS apps to behave more like tablet software, including side‑by‑side app layouts. Samsung’s Z Fold 8 Wide instead refines its established formula: a 7.6‑inch foldable display with a slightly larger 5.5‑inch outer screen, in a wider, shorter body that early testers reportedly like, and a target weight around 200g. If you want something that feels closer to a small tablet and expect Apple to address crease quality and durability, the iPhone Ultra is appealing. If you prefer an evolution of a proven fold design with a lighter feel and mature hinge engineering, the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide is the smarter pick.

Performance, Cameras, and Battery: Raw Power vs Known Quantities
Both foldables are lining up as serious performance machines, but their strengths differ. The iPhone Ultra is tipped to run Apple’s A20 Pro chip with 12GB of RAM and the company’s in‑house C2 modem, the same core silicon expected in the top regular iPhones. That combination should mean fast performance, tight thermal management, and strong network efficiency in iOS. Samsung counters with the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy and 12GB of RAM, plus storage options up to 1TB, an attractive package for power users who want plenty of room for games and media. Camera setups will likely trade blows: Apple is rumored to use two 48MP rear cameras and dedicated selfie units for both screens, while Samsung pairs a 50MP main sensor with a 50MP ultra‑wide and dual 10MP selfie cameras. Real‑world results will hinge on image processing, an area where Apple already competes well in slab phones. Battery is where Samsung holds the clearest early advantage, with leaks pointing to a 4,800mAh cell and Super Fast Charging 2.0, while Apple’s capacity remains unknown.
Software Strategy, Durability Promises, and Pricing Reality
Software and durability may define the user experience more than raw specs. Apple is treating the iPhone Ultra as “the most significant overhaul in the iPhone’s history and the first actual form-factor change,” building fold‑aware iOS features that emphasize dynamic app layouts and side‑by‑side usage without turning the device into a full iPadOS multitasking machine. Sources suggest Apple wants to fix typical foldable complaints—screen quality, durability, and particularly the center crease—rather than chasing exotic triple‑fold concepts. Samsung, by contrast, builds on years of foldable expertise, fine‑tuning hinge mechanics and reliability while still experimenting with wider and shorter form factors and advanced display tech. According to Mark Gurman, Apple’s foldable is expected to be priced “well over” USD 2,000 (approx. RM9,200), with separate leaks pointing to around USD 2,500 (approx. RM11,500). That positions the iPhone Ultra at the very top of the premium foldable phones bracket. The Z Fold 8 Wide will also be expensive, but its exact pricing is still unknown; the bigger question is which ecosystem and durability promises you trust more as an early adopter.
Buy if / Skip if
- Buy the iPhone Ultra if you want a wide, tablet-like foldable that integrates tightly with iOS and existing Apple services.
- Skip the iPhone Ultra if you are wary of first-generation hardware and prefer a foldable line with several proven generations behind it.
- Buy the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide if you value Samsung’s established foldable expertise, lighter design, and known battery capacity with fast charging.
- Skip the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide if you mainly care about Apple’s A-series chip performance, iPhone-specific apps, and tighter hardware–software integration.
- Buy the iPhone Ultra if you are willing to pay well over standard flagship prices for Apple’s design philosophy and potential crease and durability improvements.
- Skip the iPhone Ultra if you want clearer information on battery size and longevity before spending in the ultra-premium range.
- Buy the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Wide if you want a premium foldable phone now and prefer to avoid waiting for Apple’s late-year launch window.






