X300 Ultra vs Pro: What This Flagship Phone Comparison Is Really About
The Vivo X300 Pro and X300 Ultra are closely related flagship phones that target demanding users, but this flagship phone comparison centers on whether the Ultra’s camera, display, and performance upgrades are worth a sizeable price jump for your day‑to‑day use and long‑term value.
Both phones share a premium glass and aluminum build with IP68/IP69 protection, so you do not gain extra durability by moving to the Ultra. The real question is whether its sharper display, upgraded Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, and 200MP gimbal‑stabilized main camera justify spending about USD 500 (approx. RM2,300) more than the X300 Pro. In short: the X300 Pro offers strong value as a mid‑tier option in Vivo’s flagship lineup, while the Ultra is a niche, high‑end tool for users who push imaging, gaming, and connectivity to the limit.
| Spec | Vivo X300 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Build & rating | Glass front & back, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69 | Glass front & back, aluminum frame, IP68/IP69 |
| Display | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1260 × 2800, 4,500 nits | 6.82" LTPO AMOLED, 144Hz, 1440 × 3168, 4,500 nits |
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Memory & storage | Up to 16GB RAM, 1TB UFS 4.1 | Up to 16GB RAM, 1TB UFS 4.1 |
| Rear cameras | 50MP wide + 200MP periscope + 50MP ultrawide | 200MP wide + 200MP periscope + 50MP ultrawide |
| Zoom options | 3.7x optical telephoto | 3.7x optical + optional 200mm & 400mm zoom lenses |
| Video | 8K, 4K 120fps, Dolby Vision | 8K, 4K 120fps, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | 50MP AF, 4K video | 50MP AF, 4K video with gyro‑EIS & HDR |
| Battery & charging | 6,510mAh, 90W wired, 40W wireless | 6,600mAh, 100W wired, 40W wireless |
| Connectivity | Wi‑Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, USB‑C 3.2 | Wi‑Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.4, USB‑C 3.2 with DisplayPort |
| Satellite features | Optional satellite connectivity | Emergency SOS via satellite (1TB model) |
| Software support | Android 16, OriginOS 6, 5 Android upgrades confirmed | Android 16, OriginOS 6 |
| Price | around USD 1,000 (approx. RM4,600) | around USD 1,500 (approx. RM6,900) |

Display and Performance: Where the Ultra Pulls Ahead
On paper, the X300 Ultra clearly wins for raw viewing and processing power. Its 6.82‑inch LTPO AMOLED panel runs at 144Hz with a sharper 1440 × 3168 resolution, compared with the X300 Pro’s 6.78‑inch 120Hz display at 1260 × 2800. Both reach up to 4,500 nits of peak brightness, so outdoor visibility is similar. The higher refresh rate and QHD+ sharpness will appeal to users who notice every frame and pixel, especially in high‑fps games and detailed content.
The more important difference is under the hood. The X300 Pro uses MediaTek’s Dimensity 9500, while the X300 Ultra switches to Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for faster CPU and GPU performance in gaming and AI tasks. That means smoother play at high settings and quicker on‑device AI features on the Ultra. However, both offer up to 16GB RAM and 1TB UFS 4.1 storage, so multitasking and file performance remain similar across the two models. For most non‑gamers, the X300 Pro already delivers flagship‑grade speed without paying the Snapdragon tax.
Camera and Video: Ultra’s Pro‑Level Edge vs Everyday Value
The camera stack is where the X300 Ultra makes its loudest argument for that USD 500 (approx. RM2,300) premium. The X300 Pro pairs a 50MP wide main camera with a 200MP periscope and 50MP ultrawide, already covering most needs from landscape to zoom. The Ultra upgrades the main sensor to 200MP with gimbal OIS, keeping the same 200MP periscope and 50MP ultrawide, for superior low‑light detail and stabilization in demanding shooting scenarios.
Zoom flexibility also scales up: both offer 3.7x optical telephoto, but the Ultra supports optional 200mm and 400mm zoom lenses for professional‑grade long‑range photography. Video creators gain HDR10+ support on top of 8K and 4K 120fps recording, plus better stabilized HDR selfies with gyro‑EIS. For buyers who mainly share social media photos and casual clips, the X300 Pro’s triple‑camera system is more than enough. The Ultra only becomes cost‑effective if you treat your phone like a serious camera body or rely on its zoom and HDR options for paid or enthusiast‑level work.
Battery, Connectivity, Software, and Overall Value
Battery and charging differences are modest. The X300 Pro carries a 6,510mAh battery with 90W wired and 40W wireless charging, while the Ultra bumps this to 6,600mAh and 100W wired, keeping 40W wireless. In daily use, that small capacity bump and the extra 10W on the charger will not dramatically change your routine. Both phones provide modern connectivity with Wi‑Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4, but the Ultra adds USB‑C 3.2 with DisplayPort and extra Bluetooth codecs plus more advanced satellite communication, including Emergency SOS via satellite on the 1TB model.
Software support is a quiet win for the X300 Pro: it ships with Android 16 and OriginOS 6 and is confirmed to receive five major Android upgrades, while the Ultra shares the same software but without that explicit update guarantee. Priced at around USD 1,000 (approx. RM4,600), the X300 Pro anchors the Vivo flagship lineup as a balanced choice with strong performance and features. At around USD 1,500 (approx. RM6,900), the X300 Ultra targets a narrower group of power users who value every spec bump over pure premium phone value.
Buy if / Skip if
- Buy the Vivo X300 Pro if you want flagship performance and cameras at a lower price point with confirmed long‑term Android updates.
- Skip the Vivo X300 Pro if you need Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 power for top‑tier gaming or AI workloads on your phone.
- Buy the Vivo X300 Ultra if you are a photographer or creator who will use the 200MP gimbal main sensor, optional 200mm/400mm lenses, and HDR10+ video regularly.
- Skip the Vivo X300 Ultra if your usage is mostly social media, streaming, and casual photos where the X300 Pro already feels fast and capable.
- Buy the Vivo X300 Ultra if you value DisplayPort output, advanced Bluetooth codecs, and Emergency SOS via satellite on the 1TB model.
- Skip the Vivo X300 Pro if you see the phone as your primary long‑lens camera body and need every bit of the Ultra’s telephoto versatility.
- Buy the Vivo X300 Pro if premium phone value matters more than owning Vivo’s absolute top‑spec Ultra flagship.
- Skip the Vivo X300 Ultra if the USD 500 (approx. RM2,300) price gap would be better spent on accessories, storage, or a separate camera.







